A spokesperson for each discussion group (Fresh Water Resources: Changes in Water Quantity and Quality; Changing Climate and Changing Health Risks for Humans; Issues for Industry and Commerce) summarized that group's deliberations on the last day of the workshop. Then all participants were asked for general comments about what MARA should be doing.
One comment was about time constraints. The Health group is excited about integrating
their research with other environmental aspects, but can this actually occur given the
deadlines in April?
The team responded that integration is important for MARA (see flow chart), but we cannot
do everything. The full MARA team meets every 3rd week to discuss progress, with working
groups meeting more often.
Another comment was about 100 year storms which are difficult to understand. What does data show? What is a valid way to express the data? How to think about and display this type of information?
Besides report to Congress, is there responsibility for other outreach? Currently there is information on the Internet (www.deasy.psu.edu/mara). However, some information on this working website is restricted until we feel it is credible.
The groups discussed dissemination a lot (e.g., materials, workshops). Is there money
available for this type of dissemination?
The team responded that some funds are available to target specific groups, but we shall
need to use a strategy given limited funds.
When will region-specific results be available for climate change scenarios?
Team member Rob Crane is coordinating this part of the analysis, and it should be
available in April.
Are we looking at the whole Congress or a committee? How will individual districts get information? Not only are reports being developed for Congress, but follow-ups with key people are a must.
People tend to take reports more seriously when quantitative, case-specific information
is available. Are there case-specific results going to be included in the report?
There are a number of case studies being researched for MARA. In the 2nd and 3rd
iterations of regional assessments, plans are being made to expand the case studies by
adding more "what-ifs."